Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arabinform

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arabinform

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Arabinform (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim to any notability. Fails WP:WEB. Deleted in Ukrainian and Russian Wikipedia (1, 2). Mitte27 (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Cross wiki spam: Deleted in bg.wikipedia, de.wikipedia, fr.wikipedia, es.wikipedia, pl.wikipedia, nl.wikipedia, la.wikipedia, zh.wikipedia, tr.wikipedia, ja.wikipedia --Mitte27 (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Mitte27 (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Mitte27 (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Mitte27 (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Mitte27 (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I can't find any reliable sources other than Wikipedia mirror sites which would establish any notability. I'm not ruling out the existence of Russian-language sources which would be harder for me to find, but nothing has been provided in the article since it was created in 2009. I also note that this page has been speedily deleted (A7) twice before; it was tagged again not long after its creation but the tag was removed the same day by a registered user with no other edits (looks like a sock. The A7 might still apply now, though I think it'd be worth letting the article go through AfD since its been unnoticed for 10 years and get a consensus to delete. WJ94 (talk) 15:13, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The archived conference Официальный медиа-партнер page which is used as a reference for its claim to be first in its field appears to be just a page where each sponsoring company describes itself so fails WP:RS. I am seeing nothing better than social media postings, nothing which demonstrates notability by WP:NORG, WP:NWEB or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:24, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.