Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arco Progresista

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar · · 14:45, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arco Progresista

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely to promote party - created by single use account, no other contributions, deletes tags. Jamesx12345 (talk) 23:00, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Completed incomplete nom. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is an article about an alliance between three social-democratic opposition groups in Cuba. Coverage of opposition political developments in one-party states is an exceptionally important part of Wikipedia's mission. My comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuban Arco Progresista (Social-Democratic) Party apply here as well. See also WP:SYSTEMICBIAS. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I am less certain about this article than I am about the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuban Arco Progresista (Social-Democratic) Party, but WP:NONPROFIT should offer guidance. If this is verifiable in multiple sources, and exists as an "organization" (as opposed to, say, the 3 groups getting together one-time), then it should be kept. --Lquilter (talk) 15:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 13:13, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relister's comment: relisting to give time to see whether more sources can be found. JohnCD (talk) 13:14, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.