Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art Nouveau Week

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:46, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Art Nouveau Week

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Art Nouveau Week (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Refbombed promotional piece. Most sources appear to be press release churn; for example this publication, this publication and this publication, seemingly three separate pubs, contain the same copy. Here's the same promo copy appearing on multiple urls at italialiberty.it and other sites: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. GNG fail. (Not notability related, but the article was also created after the obligatory ten edits in a row to establish autoconfirmed).--- Possibly (talk) 17:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 17:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 17:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 17:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 18:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 18:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It's just puffery. "held annually since 2019"! Not much of a time span. Athel cb (talk) 19:43, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Sixteen citations in a row for the opening sentence? That alone tells me this isn't notable, but badly trying to be. Oaktree b (talk) 00:37, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Excellent research done by the nom. Megtetg34 (talk) 21:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Very important international event and has many high-level sources. Worldwilde (talk) 7:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Riteboke (talk) 08:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.