Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audiophonic visual isolation (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nja247 09:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Audiophonic visual isolation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Procedural nomination per decision to relist at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 April 21. Neutral. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are a few circular links to Wikipedia[1] and listings for the article's creator User:Lexcoleman on the web, but I can't find any reliable sources supporting mr. Coleman's "technique". Can't find anything that would give it some real notability either. Unsourced, fails notability criteria. Yintaɳ 23:11, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 00:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 00:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable, conflict of interest, probably spam. As others have noted, the technique is mentioned only in works by or about Lex Coleman, who created this page. Cnilep (talk) 13:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.