Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BGR Energy Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 16:09, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BGR Energy Systems

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 15:06, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 15:06, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:23, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT, although I'd rather redirect to an appropriate target. I'm not a certified expert in energy law, but I have written a few articles about it. There are hundreds of Indian energy companies in the largest capitalist economy in the world. If there were an appropriate target, I'd suggest a redirect, but the only one I know of is Indian Energy Exchange. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, Ministry of Power (India), State Electricity Board#India, or Energy policy of India are about public entities, not utilities. Please ping me if you have ideas to rescue this mess, or redirect it, or create an Indian energy law article. Bearian (talk) 09:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Current sourcing fails WP:NCORP. Also currently the article is just one huge mess where it would be more time efficient if we go WP:TNT on it. - Imcdc Contact 05:07, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article is so problematic that deleting it and rewriting it properly is better than trying to fix it. I haven't personally searched for sources, but the sources already in the article are insufficient to prove notability.Chanel Dsouza (talk) 09:02, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete : as per WP:TNT. Too much information in the article without any reference. Not enough sources for notability. Gauravs 51 (talk) 12:33, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.