- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:35, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Biteindex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I declined this {{db-advert}} nomination as I didn't feel it met the criteria. The original concern was it was advertising the biteindex website listed (which was a valid concern), and the website had a backlink to the Wikipedia article (less of a concern in my opinion). While I don't think the article meets the CSD criteria I do think that it doesn't meet the general notability guidelines. It seems like it is one person's interpretation of the Solunar Theory as it relates to fishing. My searches for other people using the term have come up negative. kelapstick(bainuu) 03:09, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I read this article as thinly disguised advertising for the website/service. BirdbrainedPhoenix (talk) 01:33, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 03:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 10:48, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:27, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.