Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blitz Identity Provider

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:16, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blitz Identity Provider

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails the general notability guideline as there is no significant third party coverage relating to the software. sandgemADDICT ^yeah? 01:39, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 07:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 07:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, and the company doesn't have a page either. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 19:37, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. Refs provided are companies with an apparent commercial relationship to the software. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 07:04, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as searches found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 06:53, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. FeatherPluma (talk) 21:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.