Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluegrass Revolution
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Due to failing to meet the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 18:21, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Bluegrass Revolution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for organisations or the general notability guideline (contested prod). (The same also applies to Columbus Cranes, Detroit Mechanix, Indianapolis AlleyCats and Rhode Island Rampage; however I'm heeding WP:BUNDLE's advice and only nominating one for the time being.) – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:31, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't see quite enough reliable, secondary coverage to evidence notability under WP:GNG. --j⚛e deckertalk 13:12, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.