Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonfiglioli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonfiglioli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was dePRODed with the comment that it has 5,000 employees. IMO, that's common enough for any medium sized factory and not significant. Concern was: Unsourced. No major claims of importance or significance (WP:ORG). Wikipedia is not a directory. WP:NOTYELLOW. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:10, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is clearly not notable. Ceosad (talk) 04:26, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete likely unless it can be improved as the best links I found were at News and Highbeam. SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This is a sizeable multinational company, and there are lots of news reports about various transactions, and here's a Cincinnati Post article that has a little bit about the company's US activity.[1] German Wikipedia has two articles about the company: de:Bonfiglioli Riduttori, de:Bonfiglioli Trasmital; I didn't find any articles in Italian Wikipedia, however. -- Arxiloxos (talk) 15:38, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - searches did not turn up enough to show they meet either WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. The two German articles are very poorly sourced, there are 3 - 2 dead links, and an article about the company's founder, not the company itself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.