Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Collaborative Study of Hip Fractures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Hip fracture. MBisanz ^talk 17:00, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Collaborative Study of Hip Fractures

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An individual scientific study that does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:16, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now and restart later as although this would be an interesting subject and fit for a journal of this field, I see no obvious improvement and the best my searches found was this. SwisterTwister talk 04:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 20:51, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Advertisement and study of run-of-the-mill studies belongs on news sites and analyses, not an encyclopedia. Fails WP:GNG. Esquivalience ^t 00:24, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge appropriate content to Hip fracture, including merging article history. Then delete the redirect. The study itself has yet to achieve notability, and appears to be in process. I agree it also runs afoul of WP:NOTNEWS. The section 3 "A Health Services Research agenda for hip fracture care", where all the citations are, is about hip fractures, not about the study. It looks possible that this is a promo piece for Boris Sobolev and the study. Fails WP:GNG for lack of coverage, also WP:TOOSOON. Note: This article was created on 12 May 2015‎ by editor Publichealthnerd. Publichealthnerd also created the Boris Sobolev article on 27 April 2015. --Bejnar (talk) 00:31, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge appropriate content to hip fracture with this article itself deleted, for the reasons stated above CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:32, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:33, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Further discussion occurring here Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#Hip_fracture_merge.2C_anyone.3F Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]