Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChopNotSlop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sufficient consensus. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ChopNotSlop

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Others. No detailed reliable sources establish "ChopNotSlop" as contributing "notable melodies, tunes or standards", nor it "being influential in style, technique, repertory or teaching", nor it "having established a tradition or school in a particular music genre", nor it being "listed as a significant musical influence on a musician or composer who meets the above criteria".

Also fails WP:GROUP. No depth of coverage to establish "ChopNotSlop" as a notable musical subculture. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom. The article makes no claim at notability, and a quick Googling returns very little. -- Irn (talk) 23:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 00:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 00:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe decker ^talk 04:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Can't find any sources to establish real notability, no strong claim to notability. -IagoQnsi (talk) 06:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chopped up, not slopped up is DJ OG Ron C's tag. It's not a sub genre, all part of the chopped and screwed movement. -Htown born and bred. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.138.177.226 (talk) 05:13, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.