Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chromatic Assesment in Education

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 20:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chromatic Assesment in Education

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON.Not presently notable. Winged Blades^Godric 14:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:32, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:32, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also the hatnote seems to be unrelated...? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:33, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The creator removed it. Must have been a mistake. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 17:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter¹²³ (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's hard to tell what the article is talking about, never mind whether the subject is notable; presently, it reads like a paragraph taken from the middle of a larger document. Also, the content appears to be lifted from here, so as it stands, it's a copyright violation. XOR'easter (talk) 21:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The current article is terribly written and describes ideas of almost breathtaking inanity (this based on reading the sources in French; the article itself is not very informative). Fortunately, said ideas do not seem to have caught on overmuch. The ref indicates that a couple of primary schools have tried it. That's pretty much it. No notability to speak of. — Gamall Wednesday Ida (t · c) 06:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.