Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison for Some Video Converters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shereth 16:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison for Some Video Converters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is original research, with the author just listing the specs for three products and suggesting which one he thinks is best. It is also possibly spam, since the author links to the web site for the product he prefers. The article had a prod tag on it, but it had already had two previous prod tags removed, so I thought it should come here. Calathan (talk) 03:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as advertisement. Also a possible G11 candidate. Jafeluv (talk) 05:48, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 10:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as original reasearch. We don't need badly titled, poorly constructed, subjective comparisons of random video converters. See also Comparison for some Audio Converter. Thryduulf (talk) 20:48, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per my rationale in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison for some Audio Converter. Alexius08 (talk) 23:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. ReverendWayne (talk) 16:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per everyone KMFDM FAN ^(talk!) 20:38, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.