Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compassion Propaganda
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 06:39, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be either vanity, or made up. No references provided to substantiate content. Google search for "Compassion Propaganda" returned nothing resembling this article; subsequent searches for "Muhammad Lotusflower" and "Noah Goodbaum" returned nothing at all. PeruvianLlama(spit) 06:24, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete hoax. See also AfD:Muhammad Lotusflower. - Dglynch 06:28, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom, and Dglynch's comment above. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 07:50, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. A decidedly facetious, but sincerely wrought bit of nonsense. --JJay 17:42, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Tom Harrison (talk) 23:24, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if it weren't so large, I would heartily recommend it to BJAODN. Wonderful nonsense. KillerChihuahua 00:30, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete any article whose first paragraph describes its own subject as "spurious, but sincerely wrought". Bearcat 01:30, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand that this silly page belongs on a private blog or Website. It's a vanity article through and through, and the claims against it are reasonable. It is not, however, a hoax; and I will (however objectionable it may be to do this) continue to update it and keep it in place until its deletion by Admin, at which point it will become a non-issue. If the option remains open, I'd love to shorten it, so that it might be included in BJAODN. KillerChihuahua, it's wonderful to hear you got something out of it.- M. Lotusflower
- Delete, unencylopedic nonsense. MCB 08:49, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.