Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Construtora Castelo Branco
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:10, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Construtora Castelo Branco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable company. No independent reliable source prove its notability. Seems to be WP:COI (created by Mattheus branco (talk · contribs · count)). See also: pt:Wikipedia:Páginas para eliminar/Construtora Castelo Branco. Tosqueira (talk) 22:47, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. —Tosqueira (talk) 22:48, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Self promotion. Add third party reliable sources or destroy. Zero Kitsune (talk) 00:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:CORP - The articles has no sources. EconomistBR 17:37, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 16:29, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, self-promotional. The only things that give me pause is the "Prizes and Awards" section, but the award titles are so generic that it's impossible to tell from context how important they are. Given the lack of third-party sources, I'm leaning towards them being minor awards that do not confer notability. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:52, 31 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.