Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creeper (Minecraft)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete . Marasmusine (talk) 11:55, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Creeper (Minecraft)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Character from video game with no independent notability. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 17:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable video game enemy. Reach Out to the Truth 18:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Reach Out to the Truth 18:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Recommend speedy. No assertion of notability. -- Swerdnaneb 20:03, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DO NOT DELETE. You guys are pretty behind the times if you think Minecraft is a non-notable video game. It'll only gain in popularity as time goes on. 70.77.45.29 (talk) 21:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You've misinterpreted the nominator's rationale. Minecraft is notable. A Creeper is not notable independently of Minecraft. Marasmusine (talk) 21:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Snow. No sources, no notability. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 23:58, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Seconding Snow Delete - no independent notability from Minecraft. If necessary it can receive a mention in the article, but it has no notability in and of itself. --Teancum (talk) 00:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.