Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuthy Mede

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 02:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cuthy Mede

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Cuthy Mede (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist. Clear fail of WP:GNG. No references to attest to notability or significance. Nearlyevil665 (talk) 02:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Appears to fail WP:GNG. MarylandGeoffrey (talk) 02:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.

~ Amkgp 💬 02:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malawi-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 02:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. He been the subject of an article in the Routledge Encyclopedia of Modernism ([1]) which describes him as the "most well known Malawian artist". (This article is, by the way, the very first Google search result for his name.) If he's prominent enough to be the subject of a biographical article in another encyclopedia, he passes WP:NARTIST/WP:BASIC. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:22, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per AleatoryPonderings. I was about to mention the same Routledge encyclopedia entry. Along with the several museum catalogues, the travel guide entries and a few other Google books items, this just makes it. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - based on findings by AleatoryPonderings and ThatMontrealIP. Clearly passes WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 15:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per AleatoryPonderings. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep A Google Books search shows plenty of coverage. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.