Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Collison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Collison

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

David Collison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP, referenced entirely to directly affiliated primary sources with not a shred of real reliable source coverage in real media shown at all, of a person notable only as chair of a minor political party. As usual, this is not an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL in the absence of a WP:GNG-worthy volume of media coverage about him and his work: people are not "inherently" notable just because content self-published by their own employer technically verifies that they exist, but rather notability requires media to independently pay attention to his work. Bearcat (talk) 14:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. SportingFlyer T·C 13:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a non-notable political party functionary.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:NPOL and the sourcing does not indicate a WP:GNG pass. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails automatic inclusion per WP:NPOL. However, should significant coverage in reliable sources be found, this could be re-created (soft delete). 21:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.