- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 00:19, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Decision Earth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsuccessful prod; article is unsourced, highly biased and essentially an opinion piece (gotta love those air quotes), and has shown no tendency to improve whatsoever in nearly eight years. Herr Gruber (talk) 09:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A poor article but the topic seems to pass the notability test having been reported on in the news media. Borock (talk) 14:53, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Borock has said most of what I would say, except that I note that it's not just news media reporting, but also some quasi-academic criticism. Note that sources have been added since the AFD nomination was posted. --Orlady (talk) 17:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.