Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep column station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Metro station. whatever subsection is fine. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deep column station

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has been unsourced since Feb 2007. After 15 years, I think a deletion discussion is appropriate. Coin945 (talk) 08:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy keep~~, the nominator does not propose a valid WP:DEL-REASON. The nominator does not say which notability guideline that this article fails to meet. SailingInABathTub (talk) 10:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep all of Coin945's AfDs from today as a procedural matter. Coin945 has nominated 72 articles in a short space of time with a questionable rationale ("long-term lack of sourcing" -- see WP:NEXIST) and no indication of WP:BEFORE, with Uncle G finding that a number of them can have their notability confirmed on literally the first page of Google results. This is not something the relatively small group of people who work AfD can realistically handle. Vaticidalprophet 11:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
While I don't object to any speedy keeps, I did do a little BEFORE search of my own and couldn't easily find sources describing this, not for AfD reasons, but to source the article. I'd recommend someone with a topical interest at least fix the article regardless of the outcome of this AfD, since I may not be searching for sources in the correct places. SportingFlyer T·C 18:08, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have merged to Metro_station#Construction_types along with its sibling articles. These were translated from the Russian wikipedia, which is also poorly sourced but there were a couple I added. Reywas92^Talk 18:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is a dictionary definition not an encyclopedic article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Metro_station#Construction_types per Reywas92. There is not enough here for a standalone article, but there absolutely is encyclopaedic information here as part of the broader topic. Thryduulf (talk) 14:59, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per Reywas92. Makes no sense to have an entire article on something that only exists at one station.--Rusf10 (talk) 20:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I would point out that it most definitely does not exist only at one station. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect as above. Useful information and shouldn't be deleted, but a redirect is fine. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Metro_station#Construction_types per above. Content better suited as part of a "construction types" section, valid redirect term. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 15:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, to Metro_station#Deep_column_station. Content already merged by Reywas92. SailingInABathTub (talk) 20:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.