Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DevRain Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 22:23, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DevRain Solutions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising article about a small and not notable company. — putnik 09:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this article. DevRain Solutions is a large and significant company. DevRain is a company which is known not only in Ukraine but also in Belarus and Russia (I am a resident of a small town Dobrush in Belarus). The company is the organizer and permanent participant dozen regular conferences and forums in Ukraine and abroad. The company famous for its active help in the promotion of start-ups in the international market. I want to draw attention to the fact that the Russian Wikipedia there is an active removal of articles on Ukrainian companies under the flag of "not significant". It is in this I see reason the nomination of the article for deletion. Namely user Putnik (Russian nationalist hates Ukrainians and do not hide it) after criticism on Twitter (https://twitter.com/msugvnua/status/454531589599657984 (copy http://archive.is/K9DwC )) hastened to remove the article in the English Wikipedia, guided by anger and hatred. --Dzmuh (talk) 15:30, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tawker (talk) 03:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software company article lacking significant independent coverage to establish notability (listing as a microsoft partner is not significant coverage); created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 11:36, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - May be notable, but the current references in the article don't indicate it. Must be independent, reliable sources. Unable to locate any such sources after a quick search, would change my !vote if sources could be discovered. Sources in any language are acceptable. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 10:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.