Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Docketing software (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Docketing software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The European Patent Office link is dead. There is no significant coverage of this concept to impart notability. And the article really isn't much more than a very fluffy and obvious definition of the term "docketing software" – which is fairly self-explanatory anyway! There doesn't even seem to be anything especially worth merging. ╟─TreasuryTag►co-prince─╢ 20:58, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:27, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete just a term of two words that means the obvious thing. W Nowicki (talk) 17:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.