Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Driggu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Driggu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brazilian cartoonist, writer, composer, visual artist. Article sourced in the main to wiki-style sites and owned media, subject fails WP:GNG; WP:ARTIST; WP:AUTHOR - no critical record or enduring impact on any of the creative endeavours the article credits them with. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:32, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Brazil. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:32, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Moniiquedecastro (talk) ) 07:57, 7 October 2022 (UTC) Welcome, the entry does not need to be deleted, as it was with being expanding until an editor removes it, ask me to reconsider because I'm already working on this entry correctly, within all the requirements is criteria that Wikipedia requires.[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NARTIST. No evidence that the subject meets any of our notability criteria. A WP:BEFORE search on my part yielded zero independent sources with significant coverage. Most of the sources in the article are self published and lack independence, or are passing mentions.4meter4 (talk) 20:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted. For me, the entry will continue, because the article has governmental sources, independent, only those who don't want to see it. There are links to news portals, but the ones that stand out are the links to the Brazilian government websites, not all artists or professionals have a page at (mapas.cultura.gov.br), so this article is totally remarkable. Once you accept, you prefer to delete, and the entry is still expanding, as I work on it, with work on the article Erika Hilton. .Moniiquedecastro (talk) 08:10, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- mapas.cultura.gov.br is an artist portal that anyone can edit. It is a self publishing platform with no editorial oversight.4meter4 (talk) 05:16, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:32, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST; no significant coverage outside of a few mentions that the art exists. Most of the cited sources are self-published (e.g. on Medium and mapas.cultura.gov.br) or extremely minimal database entries. Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 05:47, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caio Sael, which appears to have been a separate AfD for a page on the same subject. Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 05:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:ARTIST. WP:TOO SOON and lacks reliable sourcing. I am not finding any good sources or evidence of notability. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.