- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete ck lostsword•T•C 23:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nom - non-notable high school forum website. Fails WP:WEB. Lacks reliable sources. Rklawton 04:41, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:WEB. No references. MartinDK 06:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletions. —Tim4christ17 talk 11:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not an encyclopedic topic unless it differentiates itself (with sources) in some way from the myriad of other forums out there. --Daniel J. Leivick 18:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Etiological concerns are extrinsic to the taxonomic aims of Wikipedia--Perceive 02:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nicely written article, but the subject is totally non-notable. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing notable about it and, as a consequence, lacks reliable sources. Pax:Vobiscum 12:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.