Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineering Research Building

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:59, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Engineering Research Building

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nondescript university building. No indications of notability, implied or otherwise. Deserving of a paragraph in the universities article. Kleuske (talk) 20:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete and selectively merge to University of Texas at Arlington#Campus and architecture. Do not redirect because the name is so generic that a redirect would only misled users. Building shows no indication of notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and don't redirect. Because though the building deserves mention on Wikipedia but no content enough for whole standalone article WP:NOPAGE. No WP:SIGCOV about it to warrant that. I also are with the thought above that redirect is not appropriate here due to the genericity of the name. So new section in the main article is more appropriate thing here. –Ammarpad (talk) 09:35, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.