- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Article lacked reliable independent sources to verify notability. Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:00, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Examsguru (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article fails WP:ORG and with no matches in GBooks or GNews archives there seems little prospect of correcting the problem in the future. The article has been deleted twice before under speedy deletions on advertising grounds and in its current incarnation has been PRODded with a notability failure rational but this was quickly removed. I recommend this article is salted if deleted, in consideration of its resurrection track record. Fæ (talk) 13:42, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree that sources are lacking. Warden (talk) 14:11, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt per investigations by Warden and Fae. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 16:36, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't delete I think they have proper reference source cite. ivehien (talk) 14:11, 11 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prof.olivehien (talk • contribs) — Prof.olivehien (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Delete The references given are clearly not independent, published sources. There is no evidence given that this company meets WP:CORP which is Wikipedia's standard for inclusion for companies. Sparthorse (talk) 17:24, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete The references given by them are properly, let's improve this page.03:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)independent, published sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.113.95.18 (talk • contribs)
- Delete The references given are to two press releases and a free hosting site - so not WP:reliable sources. noq (talk) 12:27, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.