- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete - author has agreed to deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:32, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Explay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No assertion of notability. All the article shows is that the company exists. Biker Biker (talk) 10:09, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There's an assertion of nobility. If you're gonna look at the bottom of the articles, there are external links there that serve as testimonials to the company. OptiStar (talk) 10:28, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Are you meaning "The E-Book" website review of one of the company's products? It does say (paraphrasing the Google translation from Russian) that the company is known through advertising and low prices. But much more is needed to establish company notability: see WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 10:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 06:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 06:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no credible assertion of notability in article. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.