- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- External Cortex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
New journal, has not published even a single article. De-PRODded by article creator without any reason. Article creation premature, does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 18:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete At the very least a magazine has to be published before it is notable. Travelbird (talk) 18:23, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 18:21, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 18:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no WP:RS to indicate why this unpublished journal is notable. The article itself looks like an attempt at publicity. --Kinu t/c 09:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Undergrad journal that has yet to even publish. Unsurtpsingly, I can find not significant coverage about this journal. -- Whpq (talk) 15:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.