Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FaultTrack (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:17, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FaultTrack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a piece of software without evidence that it meets the notability criteria. A CSD:G4 was declined today on the grounds that the article is now significantly different from the version of this article deleted by AfD in October 2011. The references in the article are to download sites, but these attest only to its existence and do not demonstrate achieved notability. AllyD (talk) 21:07, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nomination and request that a speedy category for software be added. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:39, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agree - could have even been CSD templated. Fails GNG. --HighKing (talk) 11:29, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. The Reviews section in the article is misleading as none of the entries are actually reviews and the Softpedia 100% Clean award is nothing excpentional as it simply certifies that somebody ran some tests to verify it was free of crapware. -- Whpq (talk) 16:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - It barely passed G4. Sources are not enough to get notability as they state not much about the subject. Changes made to the structure, make very little difference between the previously created article as still the problem of WP:RS exists. →TSU ^tp* 12:40, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.