Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flippa (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Flippa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, not the subject of multiple third party press mentions. The company bought Mark Zuckerburgs' first website. Relentlessly promotional with numerous non-notable awards listed. CitizenNeutral (talk) 02:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Because they bought Mark Zuckerburgs first website might suggest notability, but other than that not much JayJay^{What did I do?} 04:17, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete They didn't actually purchase FashMash but rather Flippa was just the website on which it was sold. That's not enough per Wikipedia:EVENT. This is a non-notable company. Schenka (talk) 05:51, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. IronKnuckle (talk) 07:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.