Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frame Destination
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:33, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Frame Destination (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company/supplier, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. It is hard to imagine a circumstance where a particular picture framing company would have encyclopedic notability, and this one certainly does not. Brianhe (talk) 01:57, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- DELETE This doesn't look usable. This has some usable encyclopedic material, but it's not enough by itself.CorporateM (Talk) 21:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.