Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fulty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 12:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fulty

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a non-notable game. Content copied from http://www.infosources.org/what_is/Goaltimate.html and then modified. Probably a hoax. - Mr X 14:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the article uses a template sourced from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goaltimate. The Infosources.org article is most likely an unauthorized copy from the Wikipedia page. I'm sure MrX is an expert in many things, but his unfamiliarity with Fulty does not equate to it being a "non-notable game". The article is not a hoax. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwlawrence (talk • contribs) 15:31, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - According to the article, this sport was made up this month. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day in the park by you and your pals. Once this gets significant coverage in independent reliable sources, then and article can be considered. -- Whpq (talk) 20:11, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFT and WP:GNG. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 09:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article was intended to show the rules of an alternate game of play. Although the rules were published this month, the game has been discussed for quite some time. The article is intended to get the game and its rules out to the public so others may start playing. Perhaps this isn't the best forum, but would be found by fellow flying disk players. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JGoldin1 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a vehicle for publicizing new things. You may want to look at something like Wikia instead. -- Whpq (talk) 20:46, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: if this article is deleted, please make a notification to c:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Fulty_Field.jpg as the deletion discussion is on hold awaiting your decision here. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:42, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.