- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The argument that this is advertising is compelling and noone has bought into the sources provided. Spartaz Humbug! 17:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- GIADA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ORG. Article reads like an advertising page which has it's own logo and web store address. Describes products sold, ___location and founders, generating brand placement. utterly non notable. scope_creep talk 22:46, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 01:15, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 01:15, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The sources I was able to access and translate did not impress me. They were tangential in their coverage and or too short to meet GNG. The article is hugely promotional and as written clearly runs afoul of WP:ADVERT. Since WP:NOT is policy and trumps guidelines including WP:N, the article needs a major rewrite to be kept, even if notability is established. All of which said, I don't read Italian so it is possible that there could be sources out there that ring the notability bell. But as of right now, it fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP in addition to the SPAM issue already noted. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:28, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:40, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Relister's comment: I closed this as "delete", but am reopening the discussion after a list of sources possibly indicating notability was submitted on my talk page. It follows. Sandstein 16:42, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
List of sources
|
|---|
|
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Relisting comment: I've also relisted as after the above issue I believe this merits a further discussion.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - My review of translations of the additional listed materials suggests that they are glorified press releases. The "articles" really only support that there is one store in Milan, which is not notable. Also many of the "articles" discuss future plans but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.--Rpclod (talk) 20:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Relisting comment: Relisted to obtain more input per sources presented in the discussion.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:02, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I am submitting to your attention some more third sources that, in my opinion, prove that Giada satisfies the requests to be on Wikipedia. Two of them are from front-rank nationally relevant newspapers: La Repubblica and Il Sole24ore. Where available, I have added a link to the corresponding page on the web. Thanks for your attention, I'm confident that this will help to reconsider the case positively.
- Roddolo, Enrica. “Ecco il mio business, prezioso come Giada”, Il mondo, 27 September 2013, p. 12-13.
- Crivelli, Giuglia. “Giada sbarca in Montenapo, stile italiano, capitali cinesi”, Il Sole 24 Ore-Moda 24, 6 September 2013, p. 22
On website: “Giada sbarca in Montenapo, stile italiano, capitali cinesi”
- Ciullo, Giovanni N., “Il percorso inverso di Giada Italia Cina andata-ritorno”, La Repubblica-Affari Finanza, 7 October 2013
On website: “Il percorso inverso di Giada Italia Cina andata-ritorno”
- Epiro, Stephanie, “Giada opens in Milan”, wwd.com, 17 September 2013.
-Silvia.gasparri (talk) 11:27, 23 September 2014
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.