Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GK Elite Sportswear (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 11:50, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GK Elite Sportswear

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As stated by Piotrus, the available sources even in the last AfD were clear published and republished press releases, company announcements and listings, none of them are substantial and our policies are clear about this, including about the fact there's no inherited notability from anything, hence simply "Any sourcing" is not a keep basis alone. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No keep arguments beyond WP:GOOGLEHITS. Nobody seems to be able to point out to a single quality source. Passing mentions in Google, etc. do not suffice for WP:NCOMPANY, and claiming otherwise, well, fallacious. If anyone wants to vote keep, please go to the trouble of specifically linking to individual sources, and explaining why they are reliable, in-depth, represent significant coverage, etc. as requested by WP:NCORP and GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - only in-depth coverage are local articles about the business. —Мандичка^YO 😜 07:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- an unremarkable private company going about its business. Notability is not inherited from notable athletes who use the product. Content is advertorial in nature so WP:PROMO applies as well. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:51, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.