- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- GRICES (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only reference for this organization is a RFP (Request For Proposal) and does not discuss this government office in any depth. I did search for additional sources to establish notability. The two sources provided on the Talk page both failed verification. Created on 25 September 2007 JoeNMLC (talk) 04:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, Science, Technology, and Portugal. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete since there is no clear evidence of notability. IP editor posted a two sources on the article talk page, but neither is usable. Nothing relevant shows up on Google. Anton.bersh (talk) 09:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete not notable per WP:GNG and it's not a surprise that no reliable sources available.--BoraVoro (talk) 13:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.