Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gio Matteo Natoli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gio Matteo Natoli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person does not appear to meet our notability requirements – one brief mention is all I've been able to find in modern sources. The page was created by globally-locked long-term nuisance editor Alec Smithson, who was/is obsessed with people named "Natoli". Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I haven't come across Alec Smithson's other stuff, but this also has an article in the Portuguese version of Wikipedia. ~~That one seems very well-sourced. I think this is probably notable but~~ most sources will not be in the English language. MartinJones (talk) 12:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, MartinJones, that's Alec Smithson for certain (note the Telecom Italia IP address)! But to be doubly sure, pinging Voceditenore – who is also familiar with this editor – for a second opinion. However well-sourced that page may look at first sight, you'll note that even with all the duplicated references and general bluster and obfuscation, there's exactly one reference there that's less than about 150 years old – the same Domenico Ligresti book that's the only ref in the stub I wrote here. I read Italian without difficulty, by the way, and have searched for sources in that language. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your detailed and convincing response, Justlettersandnumbers. MartinJones (talk) 14:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Perhaps these edits on Wikidata provide some useful cross-connections to other pages and projects which could be affected by related issues. Regards, HaeB (talk) 03:08, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:36, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete S’io credesse che mia risposta fosse A persona che mai tornasse al mondo, . . . That is to say subject does not even have an inkling of significance let alone notability. Found nothing onGale. Google books was unavailing. Maybe we should a establish a special CSD cat for article's creator. Dloh cierekim 21:44, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.