Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hand Drawn Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hand Drawn Pressing. Of note is that there are two comments at Talk:Hand Drawn Pressing supporting merging the content of Hand Drawn Records to Hand Drawn Pressing. There is also commentary at Talk:Hand Drawn Records for redirection from the creator of this AfD discussion and another user who has not contributed to this AfD discussion. Since this has been closed as a redirect, the Revision history remains available if anyone wants to merge some content. North America1000 12:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hand Drawn Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am bringing this to AfD because I followed the process at WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT and it has been reverted. The blank-and-redirect instructions say that in this circumstance, nominating the article for deletion is a way to obtain more input.

As I wrote on the article talk page and in my edit summary, I had reviewed the three references and found that they were all about the manufacturing arm of the business which already has an article about it, Hand Drawn Pressing. It seemed uncontroversial to go ahead and be bold in redirecting Hand Drawn Records to Hand Drawn Pressing.

If, at some later date, there is enough content about the record label to warrant a separate article for that aspect of the business then the revert can, of course, be turned back into an article. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:17, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 13:31, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.