- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Listed for 20 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:19, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hero Card (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
lacks third party coverage [1]. LibStar (talk) 04:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Simply searching for "hero card" gives a lot of irrelevant results, and searching only for "herocard" gives too few. The solution for a lack of sources is adding them, not deleting the article. For example:
San Jose Mercury News (behind paywall, but it's still coverage)
The Deseret News (paywall again)
Cooperation among Cooperatives: A System of Mutual Exchange in the Northeast (A master's thesis)
Organizing for community controlled development
.....etc. Hairhorn (talk) 04:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 05:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep and rewrite. The article feels promotional in its nature, so I don't quite consider it viable in its current state - ergo the rewrite. The paywall coverage is a start, but it's not really free - ergo the weak. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 05:25, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Deseret News —> http://archive.southcoasttoday.com/daily/04-97/04-27-97/f03bu278.htm — Rankiri (talk) 15:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.