Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Minnesota

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Minnesota. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Minnesota|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Minnesota. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to US.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch


Minnesota

edit
List of Minnesotan desserts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List is mostly unsourced and few, if any, are unique or exclusive to the state of Minnesota. I have made and eaten some of these in the Canadian Arctic. It violates Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a directory. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:59, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Lists, and Minnesota. WCQuidditch 00:04, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Mostly WP:OR and most entries are not unique to Minnesota. Ajf773 (talk) 00:28, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Kahlo157, you made the list at Cuisine of Minnesota#Desserts and pastries – why exactly does this need to be a redundant, duplicate page?? As was said, many of these are eaten across the country, so I encourage you to continue work on that article but clean it up to be only those most emblematic of Minnesota cuisine, ideally with more contextual prose. Reywas92Talk 01:55, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I created this page, and am currently working on one for dishes of Minnesota in an effort to conform the cuisine of Minnesota page to be more like the the style of other cuisine pages (Italian cuisine, cuisine of Quebec etc) which have a short list of notable foods followed by a separate page listing all of the foods within the cuisine. I am assuming the food you are referring to that is eaten across the country is the blueberry muffin, which I only included because it is the state muffin. That being said it is eaten throughout the country so I will take it off. Thanks for the feedback. Kahlo157 (talk) 15:11, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    A section of desserts in Cuisine of Minnesota with ones that are relevant to the state is fine. So listing bundt cakes, Pie à la Mode, and blueberry muffins which are relevant as they were invented there and one is the state muffin. However, things like marzipan, rice pudding, and dessert bars are eaten world wide and not particularly associated with one state in the US and make it an indiscriminate list. Any other list of desserts by sub-national entity should also probably be deleted. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:03, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - we call redundant articles "WP:FORKs" for a good reason. Also, several of these desserts were extant in other places long before they were "invented" in Minnesota. For example, marzipan was imported from Germany in the 19th Century, and rice pudding was popular among children in the 1970s as far apart as New York City and Manila. Bearian (talk) 10:26, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Paul S. Victor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSIC and unreferenced. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 21:58, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shoreline Public Adjusters, LLC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Connected contributor. Recently started company in 2025. Non-notable. Frap (talk) 23:51, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Don Bleu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local radio host - Google search and news search yield no significant non-local coverage, and awards not significant enough to meet WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Current references almost exclusively non-independent local radio news sources. Epsilon.Prota talk 16:27, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Don Bleu 'suffers' through L.A. winter". Minneapolis Tribune. 1979-09-28. p. 3C. Archived from the original on 2025-08-12 – via Newspapers.com.
  2. ^ Malaspina, Rick (1981-08-30). "Don Bleu and his lawn wait to grow up". Oakland Tribune. p. I-26. Archived from the original on 2025-08-12 – via Newspapers.com.
  3. ^ Mann, Bill (1989-07-27). "Fired, but not Bleu". Oakland Tribune. p. C-6. Archived from the original on 2025-08-12 – via Newspapers.com.
  4. ^ Fong-Torres, Ben (1989-07-24). "'X-100' puts DJ Don Bleu out of work". San Francisco Chronicle. p. F1. Archived from the original on 2025-08-12 – via Newspapers.com.
  5. ^ Mirabella, Alan (1988-09-12). "Institutionalized comedy". New York Daily News. p. 31. Archived from the original on 2025-08-12 – via Newspapers.com.
  6. ^ Cory, Matt (1998-01-29). "This guy's voice really carries". Grand Forks Herald. p. 1. Archived from the original on 2025-08-12 – via Newspapers.com.
  7. ^ Fong-Torres, Ben (2011-12-11). "Big changes for Don Bleu, 'Green,' KNEW". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on 2012-07-19.
  8. ^ Bleu, Don (2025-02-14). "The Don Bleu Interview" (Interview). Interviewed by Bennett, Michael. California Historical Radio Society. Archived from the original on 2025-03-24.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 16:57, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 18:00, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Minnesota Proposed deletions

edit