Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hexpressions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to List of systemless fantasy role-playing game supplements#Days of Yore. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 17:45, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hexpressions

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Hexpressions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hexpressions doesn't seem to have many reliable sources and probably fails notability guidelines. It's an orphan article, so it won't hurt many pages to delete this. GrinningIodize (talk) 16:52, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Games. GrinningIodize (talk) 16:52, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to List of systemless fantasy role-playing game supplements#Days of Yore, one capsule review is not enough for notability. --Mika1h (talk) 12:14, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy. Daranios (talk) 15:21, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to List of systemless fantasy role-playing game supplements#Days of Yore as WP:Alternative to deletion. With only one review it does not seem to be notable for a stand-alone article, but that does not mean that it cannot be adequately treated within a list. Daranios (talk) 15:21, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as above, a quick search on the Internet Archive confirms that the Space Gamer source seems to be the only readily available one. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 06:22, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.