- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 17:00, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hidden hand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No sources about the subject; at best, passing mentions in books on conspiracy theories. The main reference seems to consist of a mention of a poem thus titled, without a discussion of the significance of the term. The other "references" are a list of books with "Hidden Hand" in the title, many of them clearly nor related to conspiracy theories. If we remove the clutter, what remains amounts to a dictionary definition. Huon (talk) 17:15, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia isn't a directory of books with "Hidden Hand" in the title — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 23:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:N and WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 10:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- conflation of several different titles and things. No reliable sources are cited to explain why it is important, or even to define the term to any precision. Bearian (talk) 00:56, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.