Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Rights in Qura'n and

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. It turns out this article is, yes, only trivially different than the same author's previous Islamic Perspective on Human Rights (AfD discussion). —Cryptic 10:26, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Human Rights in Qura'n and

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Human Rights in Qura'n and (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

Human Rights in Qura'n and Islam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTESSAY - might be a recreation of another recently deleted article on the same topic Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Perspective on Human Rights - this article is also sourced in large part directly to the Quran, with personal interpretation, as well as multiple references to Wikipedia itself. Seraphim System ^(talk) 12:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Seraphim System ^(talk) 12:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Seraphim System ^(talk) 12:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Seraphim System ^(talk) 12:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete If you took out all the original research, synthesis, and personal opinion, you might have a title left. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:03, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• DELETE per nominator. Not an encyclopedic article, and seems to be full of original research. Violation of WP:NPOV as well. Tillerh11 (talk) 20:13, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. "...and ...?" The title puts you in a state of suspenseful anticipation ... only to be be disappointed over the usual religious nonsense, POV and OR. Del per WP:DEL14. Sam Sailor 23:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.