Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hybrid learning environment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 19:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hybrid learning environment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Neologism; no reliable third-party sources. KurtRaschke (talk) 20:43, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I have added a few external links to the article. Also, Google shows many search results. Comments? -- RyRy5 (talk) 21:43, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Locobot (talk) 01:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC) RMHED (talk) 14:58, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, the external links either don't mention hybrid learning environments, or don't seem to have much to do with the article. An article on hybrid learning environments may be worth having, but one dealing with such environments in the New Zealand context only is too narrow.-gadfium 09:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —gadfium 09:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable neologism. Ford MF (talk) 17:11, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.