Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Islam: A Guide for Catholics (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:47, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inside Islam: A Guide for Catholics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:N.   Cs32en Talk to me  13:00, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Could not find significant coverage in reliable sources - nearly everything is either a passing mention (not significant) or a more-or-less personal website (not reliable). Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:10, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:16, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I agree. Book seems pretty non-notable. --Pstanton (talk) 00:04, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The few secondary sources are damn obscure. FuFoFuEd (talk) 00:15, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete AgreeFeatherPluma (talk) 01:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.