Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Explorer 7 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. While a merge can be an outcome of an AfD, deletion is the primary use. AfD should not be used to discuss an article where deletion is not a possibility. A talk page discussion with a link on WP:PM will suffice. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 20:43, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Explorer 7 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

The article is mostly comprised of the same information as the Internet Explorer article and related articles. Themodernizer 20:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep. Perfectly valid, well-sourced article, contains more than enough valid info to stand on its own. Nominator's rationale does not call for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 20:22, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong and Speedy Keep. Perfectly valid article, compliant with WP:N. No policies support this articles deletion. J-stan ^Talk_Contribs 20:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep. What the...? --Targeman 20:32, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. According to WP:AFD: Articles for deletion (AfD) is where Wikipedians discuss whether an article should be deleted. Articles listed here are debated for up to five days, after which the deletion process proceeds based on Wikipedia community consensus. The page is then either kept, merged and/or redirected, transwikied (copied to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikiquote, Wiktionary, or another language's Wikipedia, and then redirected or deleted—please note that it cannot be transwikied to Wikitravel or Wikinews), renamed/moved to another title, userfied to the creator's user page or user subpage, or deleted per the deletion policy. Therefore, a merge is a valid result of this nomination. Moreover, according to WP:MM: There are several good reasons to merge a page: Duplicate - There are two or more pages on exactly the same subject and having the same scope. Therefore, duplicate information is a valid reason for a merge. Themodernizer 20:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.