Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic front in aleppo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 01:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic front in aleppo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This author has created two unsourced POV articles unfit for mainspace (including BLP vios) (see Jabhat Ansar Al Sham. Originally I moved to draft to give the author time to fix the problems but they simply recreated in it mainspace. (See Draft talk:Islamic front in aleppo) // Timothy :: talk 00:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Organizations, Religion, Islam, and Syria. Skynxnex (talk) 01:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Is an absolute trainwreck. Even if there was a shred of notability, it would have to be blown up. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 10:38, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, normally I would recommend draftifying as deletion is not cleanup but since this is just a copy and paste move they can continue working on the draft that already exists. This will give the creator plenty of time to cite their sources and have experienced editors point out whats wrong with it when they submit it. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 17:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete given the same arguments provided above. Creator has made other articles with copy-paste moves and has been informed about the proper way to publish articles. Significa liberdade (talk) 18:09, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Upon further review, it looks like this article may have been recreated following a speedy delete, making it eligible for G4. On July 30, 2A00:23EE:15F8:8B21:AC2B:E4FF:FEA3:551E proposed the article for speedy deletion because an article already existed for the topic (see: User talk:Libya345433#Your contributed article, Islamic front in aleppo. Three hours later, Libya re-created the page with the edit summary "Right leave alone 😔". As such, this should be CSD G4. Further, Libya has received a vandalism warning. Significa liberdade (talk) 18:35, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
i forgot to be honest about the jabhat Ansar Al Sham deletion Libya345433 (talk) 21:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.