Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Oettinger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Oettinger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN amateur teenage hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence that he meets the GNG. Article is all but unreferenced in any case, and the creation of an editor with numerous such articles up at AfD. Ravenswing 19:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: WP:TOOSOON for now. Best article I found for GNG is this decent draft profile from THN. Everything else is in the realm of WP:ROUTINE and passing mentions, usually less than a paragraph. Un-delete when and if he gets drafted in the first round. Yosemiter (talk) 03:02, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Besides the THN article I also found this from nhl.com and this from the Boston Globe. There is also this from USHL, although that may not qualify as "independent." But even without that, I think he meets the GNG bar. Rlendog (talk) 15:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone can access the Detroit Free Press from January 30, 2016 there may be another article on him on page B7. I can see a promising looking snippet on newspapers.com, but the full article is behind a paywall. Rlendog (talk) 16:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Possesses high potential. Hurrygane (talk) 19:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moving to Draft status would be appropriate. All these articles were likely created prematurely and have at least a 50% chance of being a first round pick in the NHL draft. Yosemiter (talk) 14:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Draftify???
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 04:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Has been the subject of significant coverage, including [1] [2] [3] - Hirolovesswords (talk) 19:04, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the sources provided by Hirolovesswords are enough to get him past GNG even if he doesn't meet NHOCKEY. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sources found by Hirolovesswords establish that Jake Oettinger passes Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. Cunard (talk) 04:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It passes WP:GNG due to the sources found by Hirolovesswords --Kostas20142 (talk) 12:01, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.