Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KVBZ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KVBZ

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article tagged for notability since October 2015. I have not been able to find any in-depth coverage form independent reliable sources to meet WP:COMPANY or our general notability guidelines. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator See bellow. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A rolling stock carbuilder is going to be notable, but finding English-language sources is always going to be a challenge. The name of the article is problematic. Up until a few days ago it was at Kriukiv Railway Car Building Works; that or KVSZ or Krukovka Carriages seem like better names. I'm not sure why Endrū Hejs (talk · contribs) moved the article. KVBZ appears to maybe be the company's stock symbol, but I wouldn't expect a reliable source to use that. See for example this article in the International Railway Journal: Ukrainian prototype DMU enters service. I believe that's the same company, but the relevant nouns at KVSZ, Kryukov Wagon Plant, and Kremenchug. Mackensen (talk) 11:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw my nomination Hello @Mackensen: Thank you for your contribution. You are right. According to WP:ORGSIG a company is not inherently notable for being a stock carbuilder. I could not find sources under the original name and the one you cited does not contribute to establish notability as, in my opinion, falls under trivial coverage as per WP:CORPDEPTH. But by doing a search on the new name I could see that the company is listed at an index of the Ukranian stock exchange and I could find this valid source: Company Overview of Krukivsky Carriage Works I could not find anything usable from Google, but I noticed that it was recently linked to the Russian project where I saw there are indeed plenty of references (in Russian)see here. I have not analyzed them in depth, It would be very helpful if Russian or Ukrainian speaking editors could contribute to improve the article, but I am convinced that notability is met.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.