Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kryptic (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kryptic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Contested prod, non-notable backyard wrestler. A google search for "Canadian Wrestling Crusade" returns zero non-Wikipedia google hits. Kesac (talk) 05:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speediest delete possible Not only does Kesac's google search have no results, but the creator, who is the only major, registered contributor, redirects his user page to this page, which reeks horribly of an auto-biography. --Evan Seeds (talk)(contrib.) 06:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 06:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Important Note The prior AfD was for a different subject, so its existence means nothing in this case. Ψν^Psi_nu 07:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • And then Delete per nom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psinu (talk • contribs) 07:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Restore, then Delete it again just to be sure. Vani-tastic. Lankiveil (talk). —Preceding comment was added at 12:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, fails the everything test. RFerreira (talk) 06:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.