Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learning Streams
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Learning Streams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A disputed speedy where the article's creator notes, rightly, that the speedy deletion criterion does not apply to schools. An examination of the website (http://learningstreamsclass.org) reveals that this is apparently some kind of fee-paying tutoring operation for elementary students, not part of the state's school system. As well, there are no reliable sources to indicate that this commercial or semi-commercial entity has any notability and I found none in a brief search. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:59, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete I tagged this for a speedy delete beforehand, but there doesn't seem to be a catagory for schools so it ended up here. The page is obviously just nonsence and shouldn't be kept on here.If the article was completly rewritten properly I do think it should stay but not in its current guise. Tresiden (talk) 21:54, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can not find any significant coverage of this. The general consensus is that most schools are notable, but this one does not appear to be notable. This appears to be the website for the school. ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 00:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.